Broadband Law Could Force Rural Residents Off Information Superhighway

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Norm dePlume
    Err foil
    • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    • 14904

    #1

    Broadband Law Could Force Rural Residents Off Information Superhighway

    Rent seeking brought to you by cable companies.

    Broadband Law Could Force Rural Residents Off Information Superhighway

    WILSON, N.C. — On the first day of the harvest last week, a line of trucks brimming with sweet potatoes rolled into Vick Family Farms, headed for a new packing plant that runs on ultrafast internet.

    The potatoes were tagged with online bar codes to detail the plots where they grew, their types of seed, and dates and times picked. On a conveyor belt, 50 flashing cameras captured and sent images of the spuds to an online program that sorted the Carolina Golds by size and quality and kicked them into boxes.

    The Vick family built the plant only after the nearby city of Wilson agreed early last year to bring its municipal broadband service to the 7,000-acre farm. Since the plant opened in October, the farm’s production and sales to Europe have jumped.

    But now, after a legal battle between state and federal officials over broadband, the farm and hundreds of other customers in the eastern region of the state may get unplugged.

    “We’re very worried because there is no way we could run this equipment on the internet service we used to have, and we can’t imagine the loss we’ll have to the business,” said Charlotte Vick, head of sales for the farm.

    Vick Family Farms got caught between the Federal Communications Commission and North Carolina state legislators over the spread of municipal broadband networks, which are city-run internet providers that have increased competition in the broadband market by serving residents where commercial networks have been unwilling to go.

    ...

    In Wilson, officials said cable and telecom companies rejected requests to team up with them and upgrade aging networks, which led the city to start its own broadband network called Greenlight in 2008. The service provides speeds of one gigabit per second, which lets people download big video files in seconds or minutes instead of several hours with DSL or basic cable broadband.

    In 2011, companies like Time Warner Cable, represented by the cable lobbying association, asked the North Carolina legislature to adopt a law to limit Wilson’s ability to serve customers outside Wilson County, even though the city serves electricity customers in four additional counties.

    Grant Goings, Wilson’s city manager, said the court decision made it unclear “how we can bridge the digital divide and create economies of the future when there are corporate interests standing in the way.”
    Enjoy.
  • Tom Servo
    Area Man
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 5898

    #2
    This whole thing is so stupid. Cities ought to be allowed to provide internet service if the locally available services refuse to offer adequate service. It's their monopoly to lose! It's basically another utility at this point, like electricity, gas and garbage collection.

    The fact that Wilson can provide power outside the city limits but not internet exposes the height of the protectionist, capitalist hypocrisy of these anti-muni-net laws.

    Perhaps the solution would be for the city of Wilson to simply annex anyone who wants gigabit internet?

    I'd kill for affordable, faster internet. Where I live a consortium called Riviera Utilities offers electricity, gas, garbage and cable for the entire city and another nearby town. The cable part has zero internet/VOD service. We are stuck with CenturyLink DSL. It's not bad, per se, but how fast the service is depends on how new your neighborhood is. Anything built after 2009 (?) gets Prism TV and fiber internet up to 75 Mbps; older neighborhoods like mine top out at a theoretical and rarely achievable 25 Mbps with bonded DSL, whatever that means. Neighborhoods that date back to the Snook Telephone days are stuck with 8 Mbps.

    But the phone company has a monopoly, and the utility board has said they will never add internet, or VOD, or more than 30 HD channels to their service because the people who have it like it just fine.

    As I like to joke, my city was one of (if not the) first in the state to get broadband DSL internet. And they've been content to stick with 1990's technology ever since.
    “Any sufficiently advanced capitalism is indistinguishable from rent seeking.” ~ =j

    Comment

    • scott
      Go-to Guru
      • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
      • 15799

      #3
      The irony in all of this is that the government is a victim of its own rules. I'm sure someone is going to blame the free market for this.

      Why can't the farm set up a wireless link from their facility to an office in town?
      "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
      -John Locke

      "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
      -Newman

      "Grievance groups are playing King of the Hill."
      -Newman

      Comment

      Working...