Let's move the discussion here and let Gramps suffer in peace.
All medical choices, whether directed by established licensed caregivers or laymen, should balance risk vs. benefits.
The present GLP-1 rage for weight loss is a fine example in my humble opinion. One of the biggest frustrations doing family practice was the realization of how low a percentage of patients actually wanted to invest any effort into their health. "Diet & Exercise" is a cliche' to most, not because they doubt its effectiveness, but because it takes effort. I could burn an enormous amount of bandwidth telling you the endless list of excuses I heard during my career.
So back to risk vs. benefit.
In the obese type2 diabetic that likely prompted their disease with horrible nutrition choices and less than favorable activity levels the instant karma of a GLP-1 might might pass the risk vs. benefit scale. But what about the otherwise "healthy" person who doesn't like what the mirror tells them and wants a more attractive figure (male & female) in a more rapid method with far less work than diet & exercise? I personally know four people using GLP-1's who were never told they will lose muscle mass and strength as well as perceived excess fat. There's also many potential side effects such as gastric paresis that are possible risks.
So where does the risk vs. benefit scale tilt in this case?
I prescribed sleep aides and smoking cessation drugs in my career but always related the potentially huge risk profile. Had a few Chantix users develop profound depression which luckily disappeared rapidly after stopping the drug. I had one Ambien user that failed to heed my advice to use the initial dosing in an observed environment so if a "walking amnesia" occurred someone could intervene. That patient "woke up" in a holding cell after a traffic accident with no memory of even leaving the house.
This is the reason I adamantly urge caution accepting medical advice from verbal studies of one like your Aunt and neighbor.
Your mileage may vary. 0.02
All medical choices, whether directed by established licensed caregivers or laymen, should balance risk vs. benefits.
The present GLP-1 rage for weight loss is a fine example in my humble opinion. One of the biggest frustrations doing family practice was the realization of how low a percentage of patients actually wanted to invest any effort into their health. "Diet & Exercise" is a cliche' to most, not because they doubt its effectiveness, but because it takes effort. I could burn an enormous amount of bandwidth telling you the endless list of excuses I heard during my career.
So back to risk vs. benefit.
In the obese type2 diabetic that likely prompted their disease with horrible nutrition choices and less than favorable activity levels the instant karma of a GLP-1 might might pass the risk vs. benefit scale. But what about the otherwise "healthy" person who doesn't like what the mirror tells them and wants a more attractive figure (male & female) in a more rapid method with far less work than diet & exercise? I personally know four people using GLP-1's who were never told they will lose muscle mass and strength as well as perceived excess fat. There's also many potential side effects such as gastric paresis that are possible risks.
So where does the risk vs. benefit scale tilt in this case?
I prescribed sleep aides and smoking cessation drugs in my career but always related the potentially huge risk profile. Had a few Chantix users develop profound depression which luckily disappeared rapidly after stopping the drug. I had one Ambien user that failed to heed my advice to use the initial dosing in an observed environment so if a "walking amnesia" occurred someone could intervene. That patient "woke up" in a holding cell after a traffic accident with no memory of even leaving the house.
This is the reason I adamantly urge caution accepting medical advice from verbal studies of one like your Aunt and neighbor.
Your mileage may vary. 0.02
Comment