More Workers Are Claiming ‘Wage Theft’

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gingersnap
    Resident stylistic consultant
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 24058

    #1

    More Workers Are Claiming ‘Wage Theft’

    More Workers Are Claiming ‘Wage Theft’
    By STEVEN GREENHOUSEAUG. 31, 2014


    MIRA LOMA, Calif. — Week after week, Guadalupe Rangel worked seven days straight, sometimes 11 hours a day, unloading dining room sets, trampolines, television stands and other imports from Asia that would soon be shipped to Walmart stores.

    Even though he often clocked 70 hours a week at the Schneider warehouse here, he was never paid time-and-a-half overtime, he said. And now, having joined a lawsuit involving hundreds of warehouse workers, Mr. Rangel stands to receive more than $20,000 in back pay as part of a recent $21 million legal settlement with Schneider, a national trucking company.

    “Sometimes I’d work 60, even 90 days in a row,” said Mr. Rangel, a soft-spoken immigrant from Mexico. “They never paid overtime.”

    The lawsuit is part of a flood of recent cases — brought in California and across the nation — that accuse employers of violating minimum wage and overtime laws, erasing work hours and wrongfully taking employees’ tips. Worker advocates call these practices “wage theft,” insisting it has become far too prevalent.

    Some federal and state officials agree. They assert that more companies are violating wage laws than ever before, pointing to the record number of enforcement actions they have pursued. They complain that more employers — perhaps motivated by fierce competition or a desire for higher profits — are flouting wage laws.

    Many business groups counter that government officials have drummed up a flurry of wage enforcement actions, largely to score points with union allies. If anything, employers have become more scrupulous in complying with wage laws, the groups say, in response to the much publicized lawsuits about so-called off-the-clock work that were filed against Walmart and other large companies a decade ago.

    Here in California, a federal appeals court ruled last week that FedEx had in effect committed wage theft by insisting that its drivers were independent contractors rather than employees. FedEx orders many drivers to work 10 hours a day, but does not pay them overtime, which is required only for employees. FedEx said it planned to appeal.

    Julie Su, the state labor commissioner, recently ordered a janitorial company in Fremont to pay $332,675 in back pay and penalties to 41 workers who cleaned 17 supermarkets. She found that the company forced employees to sign blank time sheets, which it then used to record inaccurate, minimal hours of work.

    David Weil, the director of the federal Labor Department’s wage and hour division, says wage theft is surging because of underlying changes in the nation’s business structure. The increased use of franchise operators, subcontractors and temp agencies leads to more employers being squeezed on costs and more cutting corners, he said. A result, he added, is that the companies on top can deny any knowledge of wage violations.

    “We have a change in the structure of work that is then compounded by a falling level of what is viewed as acceptable in the workplace in terms of how you treat people and how you regard the law,” Mr. Weil said.

    Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
    His agency has uncovered nearly $1 billion in illegally unpaid wages since 2010. He noted that the victimized workers were disproportionately immigrants.
    I bet they were and aside from being "victimized", they and their employers are undercutting wages for Americans in low-skill jobs.

    We could easily fix this by requiring 10 days of jail time for every illegal worker a CEO employs. CEOs, not HR people, not crew supervisors, not paper-pushers - owners. If it's publicly held company, jail for the board of directors.

    They'd smarten up pretty quick.

    NYT
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."
  • Gramps
    Junior Member
    • Friday, October 4, 2013
    • 3850

    #2
    In '77, I moved from the Electronics Production floor to inside sales, director of special products. I went from hourly to salary. I was now working for a different company. 3rd company I had worked for in the same set of buildings. I was required to punch the clock because that company had too many salaried workers, by Fed Gov standards and to the FedGov, I was classified as hourly, in name only. The time clock punch was for show to the FedGov. They did not hold me to any standards, just had to punch on in the am and out in the pm. The Corp was a group of companies owned by a single owner. The sales and office staff were a separate company. Accounting and Payroll was a separate company. Electronics production was a separate company. The machine shop was a separate company. The heavy fabrication shop was a separate company. Engineering was a separate company. Transportation was a separate company. Parts was a separate company.... the foundry, shipping, etc etc..

    In '78 I took over a branch office in Stl. Once again, a separate company.
    Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
    But the Republicans are racist.

    Comment

    • Celeste Chalfonte
      apostate
      • Saturday, October 5, 2013
      • 27897

      #3
      After leaving college and learning that the job I had studied and planned for was open only to men (remember, in the 1970s, the federal government did not have to follow its own anti-discrimination laws), I went to work for a large discount retail corporation. Management trainees were salaried but, by law, hourly employees until they become actual managers. Hourly trainees couldn't work more than 48 hours per week or they had to pay OT. I found out what that meant the first week, when the store manager told me to go clock out at 5 pm on Saturday. I came back with my purse, and he said, "Where are you going? I said 'clock out,' not 'go home'." I NEVER worked less than 60 hours a week the whole time I was a trainee, usually 70. The ONLY good thing about that job was that my infrequent days off were weekdays, since the senior people got weekends off. I used those days to apply for and interview for civilized employers. The day the store manager congratulated me on passing the trainee program (hypocrite that he was - but that's a tale for another thread), I handed him my notice. I had gotten a job with the state Department of Social Services. My salary went down a little (soon made up by promotions) but my effective hourly rate went WAY up.

      Wage theft may be a new way of naming it, but it has been corporate policy since there have been corporations.
      "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

      Comment

      • Adam
        The way to a woman's heart is through her taste buds.
        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
        • 16885

        #4
        The lawsuit is part of a flood of recent cases — brought in California and across the nation — that accuse employers of violating minimum wage and overtime laws, erasing work hours and wrongfully taking employees’ tips. Worker advocates call these practices “wage theft,” insisting it has become far too prevalent.
        This gets my interest, because I'm curious how they're defining this.

        My first "real job" was at a car wash. We had the (now ubiquitous) "tip jar" out front, right where people would get into their cars after they were clean. Each week, this lock-box (later there were actually two, just as a practical matter of having them where they were accessible by every customer) would be opened up, and the tips would totaled up, then divided amongst the line workers based upon hours worked that week. The idea was that the stream of tips was approximately equal to the number of cars washed, ergo everyone got a "share" of the tips regardless of how busy it happened to be when they were working. Obviously that's not really even, but everyone considered it about as fair as it could get.

        This infuriated my mother beyond words, because she believed that each person should hustle for their own tips. And she would probably have been right, had this been a case of one person dealing with one car. The reality was that there were 5-7 people working on each car, much more of an assembly-line fashion, and several of those people were pretty much not seen by the public. So the drive-on guy in the back was basically unseen by the customer, even though he did some of the toughest, and most important, work of the whole operation.

        We were NOT forbidden from taking individual tips, and on a scant few occasions, I did indeed receive a buck, maybe two, individually. One guy came through and gave everyone who touched his car a $5 bill. At a time when minimum wage was $3.35/hour and I was making $3.85/hour, this was a pretty seriously generous tip.

        While my mother was infuriated because of the "communal tips," what she never understood was that the "tip jar" got us all a lot more in tips than we would ever have gotten individually. On a typical Thursday (when tips were passed out), most of us would get an additional $2.50 or so per hour worked, in cash, effectively raising most of our wages to close to about $6.25/hour. That was a pretty nice wage for a high school kid in the mid-'80s, when I could fill my tank right to the brim from dead-empty for about $17.


        The thing is, there is probably an argument to be made that my tips were "wrongfully taken" here because, in fact, our tips were "redistributed" by the employer. In fact, some weeks, part of our tips were withheld because of making the math even to make it fair for everyone. The intent, rather obviously, was to even things out for everyone, but one could make an argument that this was an illegal/immoral/wrong/under-handed "withholding of tips" from workers.
        It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
        In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
        Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
        Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

        Comment

        • Gramps
          Junior Member
          • Friday, October 4, 2013
          • 3850

          #5
          Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post

          Wage theft may be a new way of naming it, but it has been corporate policy since there have been corporations.
          No, since there were wage/hour laws.

          Prior to the laws, it was a daily contract.
          Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
          But the Republicans are racist.

          Comment

          • Celeste Chalfonte
            apostate
            • Saturday, October 5, 2013
            • 27897

            #6
            Originally posted by Gramps View Post
            No, since there were wage/hour laws.

            Prior to the laws, it was a daily contract.
            Well, it was certainly standard practice. That's why we have wage and hour laws. Another scourge on the country brought to you by the evil labor unions.
            "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

            Comment

            • scott
              Go-to Guru
              • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
              • 15799

              #7
              Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
              Well, it was certainly standard practice. That's why we have wage and hour laws. Another scourge on the country brought to you by the evil labor unions.
              A point that the union shills (especially those too good to join a union themselves) always remind everyone. Have the unions done anything positive this century? That's the problem, they rest on their laurels and haven't done anything positive since then.
              "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
              -John Locke

              "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
              -Newman

              "Grievance groups are playing King of the Hill."
              -Newman

              Comment

              Working...