Mummers parade courts controversy — again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phillygirl
    Not superior, just kind
    • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
    • 19840

    #1

    Mummers parade courts controversy — again

    Mummers parade courts controversy — again

    • Michael D'Onofrio Tribune Staff Writer
    • Jan 2, 2019 Updated 6 hrs ago






    Image via screenshot. The parade was broadcast on PHL17.com.



    It wouldn’t be a Mummers Parade without controversy.
    On New Year’s Day the annual parade took over Broad Street, but one skit stood out: A man with “Jay-Z” written on his clothes was using a leash to lead another man portraying Mayor Jim Kenney, who was crawling on all fours and wearing a Pinocchio-sized nose.
    Many took to social media to condemn the skit, apparently thinking that the man holding the leash was wearing blackface.
    However, the man depicted as Jay-Z was Black, Kenney said in a statement Wednesday.


    Kenney said the concept submitted to the city and Mummers organization by the Finnegan group in advance of the parade said an African-American man would portray Jay-Z, not someone dressed in blackface.
    “The Finnegan group says that it complied with its theme application,” Kenney said. “The city condemns the use of blackface in any form and will continue to work with the Mummers to ensure future performances are nondiscriminatory."
    The skit apparently referred to a July kerfuffle when Kenney called for moving Jay-Z’s annual Made in America music festival from the steps of the Philadelphia Museum of Art starting in 2019, citing logistical issues related to the two-day festival.
    But after Jay-Z published an op-ed online and held meetings with the administration, Kenney reversed course.
    NAACP Philadelphia Chapter President Rodney Muhammad said he is investigating the incident and intends to meet with Mummers organizers about the skit.
    “I’m still in the early stages of this,” Muhammad said.
    Calls to Mummers organizers were not immediately returned.


    City Council President Darrell L. Clarke condemned the skit as a display of bigotry and intolerance when he initially believed it used blackface. He added that blackface is regularly used during the Mummers parade and "people of color in our majority non-white city, including myself, do not participate in an event that we believe does not welcome us.”



    Asa khalif @AsaKhalif



    Now the MUMMERS are telling us this is a black man in Blackface..if that is true..You are still guilty. With the history of blackface in mummers parades..your racisim is even more obvious. #NoBlackface






    More pics and tweets at link


    Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
    Robert Southwell, S.J.
  • Michele
    Senior Member
    • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
    • 13964

    #2
    So, if I'm reading the article correctly, it was a self-described Black man who some thought was a White man in blackface and were outraged? Then when they found out that it was a Black man not in blackface, they were still upset?
    May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
    Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
    And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
    may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

    Comment

    • phillygirl
      Not superior, just kind
      • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
      • 19840

      #3
      Originally posted by Michele View Post
      So, if I'm reading the article correctly, it was a self-described Black man who some thought was a White man in blackface and were outraged? Then when they found out that it was a Black man not in blackface, they were still upset?
      Exactly. Because..history.

      Now, don't get me wrong. I don't care for the Mummers Parade. I think it's a bunch of drunks, both within the parade and the parade goers. I don't "get" the "Mummers Strut". I do think there have been some offensive floats and string band costumes. It's South Philly. It's a South Philly thing. Since I was not born and raised in Pa, and definitely not in South Philly, it's just not my bag.

      But, yes, they're offended when they thought it was black face, and then even more offended to find out that it is an actual black man who isn't towing the black party line and is involved in the Mummers Parade.

      There was a time when women and minorities were excluded from the Parade (hence a tradition of men in dresses...like Shakespearean times). This particular black man apparently would like to see more black people enjoy the parade and participate in it. I'm fine with that. But you won't see me making the trek downtown to view it.
      Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
      Robert Southwell, S.J.

      Comment

      • Norm dePlume
        Err foil
        • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
        • 14904

        #4
        Originally posted by Michele View Post
        So, if I'm reading the article correctly, it was a self-described Black man who some thought was a White man in blackface and were outraged? Then when they found out that it was a Black man not in blackface, they were still upset?
        Where are you seeing the word "not"?
        Enjoy.

        Comment

        • Celeste Chalfonte
          apostate
          • Saturday, October 5, 2013
          • 27897

          #5
          Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
          Exactly. Because..history.

          Now, don't get me wrong. I don't care for the Mummers Parade. I think it's a bunch of drunks, both within the parade and the parade goers. I don't "get" the "Mummers Strut". I do think there have been some offensive floats and string band costumes. It's South Philly. It's a South Philly thing. Since I was not born and raised in Pa, and definitely not in South Philly, it's just not my bag.

          But, yes, they're offended when they thought it was black face, and then even more offended to find out that it is an actual black man who isn't towing toeing the black party line and is involved in the Mummers Parade.

          There was a time when women and minorities were excluded from the Parade (hence a tradition of men in dresses...like Shakespearean times). This particular black man apparently would like to see more black people enjoy the parade and participate in it. I'm fine with that. But you won't see me making the trek downtown to view it.
          Ahem.
          "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

          Comment

          • Novaheart
            Guardian of civilization
            • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
            • 6070

            #6
            "Kenney said. “The city condemns the use of blackface in any form and will continue to work with the Mummers to ensure future performances are nondiscriminatory.""

            I think that someone needs to tell the Mayor that the city doesn't get an opinion and certainly not the right to prohibit the expression in a parade. How many times does this have to go to court?
            The year's at the spring
            And day's at the morn;
            Morning's at seven;
            The hill-side's dew-pearled;
            The lark's on the wing;
            The snail's on the thorn:
            God's in his heaven—
            All's right with the world!

            Comment

            • Novaheart
              Guardian of civilization
              • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
              • 6070

              #7
              Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
              Ahem.
              Grammar-bitch.
              The year's at the spring
              And day's at the morn;
              Morning's at seven;
              The hill-side's dew-pearled;
              The lark's on the wing;
              The snail's on the thorn:
              God's in his heaven—
              All's right with the world!

              Comment

              • phillygirl
                Not superior, just kind
                • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                • 19840

                #8
                Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
                Ahem.
                Dammit. I need to fully focus when screwing around at work and make sure I'm more grammatically correct in my postings!

                My law partner gave me a mug for Christmas that say "Yes, I'm silently correcting your grammar". I thought of you!
                Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                Robert Southwell, S.J.

                Comment

                • Michele
                  Senior Member
                  • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                  • 13964

                  #9
                  Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
                  Exactly. Because..history.

                  Now, don't get me wrong. I don't care for the Mummers Parade. I think it's a bunch of drunks, both within the parade and the parade goers. I don't "get" the "Mummers Strut". I do think there have been some offensive floats and string band costumes. It's South Philly. It's a South Philly thing. Since I was not born and raised in Pa, and definitely not in South Philly, it's just not my bag.

                  But, yes, they're offended when they thought it was black face, and then even more offended to find out that it is an actual black man who isn't towing the black party line and is involved in the Mummers Parade.

                  There was a time when women and minorities were excluded from the Parade (hence a tradition of men in dresses...like Shakespearean times). This particular black man apparently would like to see more black people enjoy the parade and participate in it. I'm fine with that. But you won't see me making the trek downtown to view it.
                  What a bunch of idiots. Bottom line...they're probably more offended someone called out Jay-Z.
                  May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
                  Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
                  And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
                  may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

                  Comment

                  • Celeste Chalfonte
                    apostate
                    • Saturday, October 5, 2013
                    • 27897

                    #10
                    Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
                    Dammit. I need to fully focus when screwing around at work and make sure I'm more grammatically correct in my postings!

                    My law partner gave me a mug for Christmas that say "Yes, I'm silently correcting your grammar". I thought of you!
                    I did NOT "dislike" your post. Damned track pad has a hair trigger.
                    "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

                    Comment

                    • Tom Servo
                      Area Man
                      • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                      • 5898

                      #11
                      Eh, they're no Comic Cowboys…

                      “Any sufficiently advanced capitalism is indistinguishable from rent seeking.” ~ =j

                      Comment

                      Working...