Another one caught, and credit due: at least the "investigation" wasn't a cover-up. It was over before lunch.
This report links to MyNorthWest . com, apparently the revealer of record:
Q13 FOX editor fired over doctored Trump address video
The Seattle Times piece here goes on at some length about the ease of producing altered images.
This extended annotation might be intended to support their suggested defense of the fired offender:
Most altered stuff, though, isn't subtle, and like the orange Trump here, pretty much glows in the dark.
One thing's clear, the old expression "A picture's worth a thousand words" is no longer true. It should be replaced by something like, "A picture's worth a skeptical look."
A staffer at local Fox affiliate Q13 has been fired after the station aired what appears to be a doctored video of President Donald Trump’s Tuesday night speech from the Oval Office.
The video was changed to make it look as if Trump was sticking his tongue out languidly between sentences. In addition, the colors in the video look more saturated, leading the president’s skin and hair to appear orange.
The video was changed to make it look as if Trump was sticking his tongue out languidly between sentences. In addition, the colors in the video look more saturated, leading the president’s skin and hair to appear orange.
“This does not meet our editorial standards and we regret if it is seen as portraying the president in a negative light,†Q13 news director Erica Hill wrote in an emailed statement early Thursday.
Later Thursday morning, Hill released another statement saying, “We’ve completed our investigation into this incident and determined that the actions were the result of an individual editor whose employment has been terminated.â€
Later Thursday morning, Hill released another statement saying, “We’ve completed our investigation into this incident and determined that the actions were the result of an individual editor whose employment has been terminated.â€
Q13 FOX editor fired over doctored Trump address video
...A listener to my program [Todd Herman] sent me a video that appears to show a deceptively edited video of President Trump’s speech from the Oval Office. We performed a side-by-side comparison of the video from our listener, apparently taken by a smart phone recording of Q13, to the raw video of Trump’s speech from CNN.
The Seattle Times piece here goes on at some length about the ease of producing altered images.
Altering and manipulating images has become all the more easy and tempting in today’s world of fractured politics and accessible technology. And this isn’t the first time a doctored video has made headlines.
These forgeries, known as “deepfakes,†can be hard to spot. BuzzFeed and Quartz have published guides to help you sort fact from fiction.
Researchers at the University of Washington’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering said in 2017 that they had developed algorithms that allow a user to turn audio clips into “lip-synced video.â€
The UW’s technology is different from the tools that would have been used to doctor the Trump video that aired on Q13. But the announcement raised immediate concerns about the potential for malicious uses.
Researchers at the University of Washington’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering said in 2017 that they had developed algorithms that allow a user to turn audio clips into “lip-synced video.â€
The UW’s technology is different from the tools that would have been used to doctor the Trump video that aired on Q13. But the announcement raised immediate concerns about the potential for malicious uses.
It is unclear whether the employee created the doctored video or just allowed it to go on air.
One thing's clear, the old expression "A picture's worth a thousand words" is no longer true. It should be replaced by something like, "A picture's worth a skeptical look."
Comment