How Companies Scour Our Digital Lives for Clues to Our Health

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gingersnap
    Resident stylistic consultant
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 24058

    #1

    How Companies Scour Our Digital Lives for Clues to Our Health

    How Companies Scour Our Digital Lives for Clues to Our Health

    An emerging field, digital phenotyping, tries to assess people’s well-being based
    on their interactions with digital devices.

    By NATASHA SINGERFEB. 25, 2018

    Your digital footprint — how often you post on social media, how quickly you scroll through your contacts, how frequently you check your phone late at night — could hold clues to your physical and mental health.

    That at least is the theory behind an emerging field, digital phenotyping, that is trying to assess people’s well-being based on their interactions with digital devices. Researchers and technology companies are tracking users’ social media posts, calls, scrolls and clicks in search of behavior changes that could correlate with disease symptoms. Some of these services are opt-in. At least one is not.

    People typically touch their phones 2,617 per day, according to one study — leaving a particularly enticing trail of data to mine.

    “Our interactions with the digital world could actually unlock secrets of disease,” said Dr. Sachin H. Jain, chief executive of CareMore Health, a health system, who has helped study Twitter posts for signs of sleep problems. Similar approaches, he said, might someday help gauge whether patients’ medicines are working.

    “It could help with understanding the effectiveness of treatments,” he said.

    The field is so new and so little studied, however, that even proponents warn that some digital phenotyping may be no better at detecting health problems than a crystal ball.

    If a sociable person suddenly stopped texting friends, for instance, it might indicate that he or she had become depressed, said Dr. Steve Steinhubl, director of digital medicine at the Scripps Translational Science Institute in San Diego. Or “it could mean that somebody’s just going on a camping trip and has changed their normal behavior,” he said.

    “It’s this whole new potential for snake oil,” Dr. Steinhubl said.

    That is not stopping the rush into the field — by start-ups and giants like Facebook — despite questions about efficacy and data privacy.

    Scanning for Suicidal Thoughts
    One of the most ambitious efforts is being conducted by Facebook.

    The company recently announced that it was using artificial intelligence to scan posts and live video streams on its social network for signs of possible suicidal thoughts. If the system detects certain language patterns — such as friends posting comments like “Can I help?” or “Are you O.K.?” — it may assign a certain algorithmic score to the post and alert a Facebook review team.

    In some cases, Facebook sends users a supportive notice with suggestions like “Call a helpline.” In urgent cases, Facebook has worked with local authorities to dispatch help to the user’s location. The company said that, over a month, its response team had worked with emergency workers more than 100 times.

    Some health researchers applauded Facebook’s effort, which wades into the complex and fraught realm of mental health, as well intentioned. But they also raised concerns. For one thing, Facebook has not published a study of the system’s accuracy and potential risks, such as inadvertently increasing user distress.

    “It’s a great idea and a huge unmet need,” Dr. Steinhubl said. Even so, he added, Facebook is “certainly right up to that line of practicing medicine not only without a license, but maybe without proof that what they are doing provides more benefit that harm.”

    For another thing, Facebook is scanning user posts in the United States and some other countries for signs of possible suicidal thoughts without giving users a choice of opting out of the scans.

    “Once you are characterized as suicidal, is that forever associated with your name?” said Frank Pasquale, a law professor at the University of Maryland who studies emerging health technologies. “Who has access to that information?”

    Will Nevius, a Facebook spokesman, said Facebook deleted the algorithmic scores associated with posts after 30 days. The cases involving emergency responders are kept in a separate system that is not tied to users’ profiles, he said.

    Facebook said it had worked with suicide prevention groups when developing the effort. Mr. Nevius added that publishing a useful study would be complex because of the difficulty in removing personal data and “the delicate nature of the posts.”

    Detecting Depression in Clicks

    Therapists traditionally diagnose depression by observing patients and asking them how they feel. Mindstrong Health, a mental health start-up in Palo Alto, Calif., is observing people’s smartphone use.

    The company has developed a research platform to continuously monitor users’ phone habits, looking at changes in taps and clicks for hints about mood and memory changes associated with depression.

    “We are building digital smoke alarms for people with mental illness,” said Dr. Thomas R. Insel, a Mindstrong co-founder and a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health.

    Mindstrong’s research app tracks 1,000 smartphone-related data points — like how long it takes someone to scroll through a contact list and click on a name. The start-up recruited 200 volunteers to participate in pilot studies. Dr. Insel said a few of the signals, like changes in users’ keyboard accuracy and speed, correlated with similar motor skills changes that researchers could measure in lab tests.

    Now the company is participating in a large government-funded study of trauma patients. Part of it involves using the Mindstrong platform to study whether patients who go on to develop post-traumatic stress disorder also develop corresponding changes in their smartphone use.

    “We’ve got these really interesting statistical signals with very high correlations,” Dr. Insel said. “But whether that’s going to work in the real world of clinical care is something we’re looking at right now.”

    He added that Mindstrong had tapped law and ethics experts to help examine the implications of its technology and develop ethical frameworks for using it.

    “You want to think through all the unintended consequences early on,” Dr. Insel said, “so they don’t come back to bite you.”

    Vetting Calls for Signs of Stress

    The traditional use of a phone — talking — is also being examined for health clues. Sharecare, a digital health company based in Atlanta, offers a wellness app with an optional feature that analyzes users’ stress levels during phone calls.

    The system uses pattern recognition technology to categorize users’ speech, the company said. After each call, the system delivers reports like “you seemed anxious” or “you seemed balanced.” It also characterizes users’ relationships with the people they call in terms of attitudes like “dominance” or “affection.”

    Jeff Arnold, a co-founder of Sharecare, described the voice scan as “an emotional selfie.”

    “If I can tell you your stress level in real time, it will in itself change your behavior,” said Mr. Arnold, who previously founded WebMD.

    (Could not bring Tweet/image over - see link.)

    Health insurers and self-insured companies use Sharecare to promote wellness and manage health care costs. Sharecare is working with the Georgia Institute of Technology to study the effectiveness of its voice analysis service.

    Jiten Chhabra, a health tech researcher at the university’s Interactive Media Technology Center, said volunteers who tried the voice-scanning feature reported feeling less stressed afterward. But he said it was too soon to tell whether the stress analysis itself directly caused the change — or whether volunteers had simply become more relaxed in their daily lives.

    The company does not record the content of the calls it scans, it said. But the app did collect phone numbers for people on the other side of calls from Sharecare users, according to an analysis by The New York Times. The service did not inform people on the phone with Sharecare users that their relationships were being analyzed.

    Jennifer Martin Hall, a spokeswoman for Sharecare, said the way the company protected data “makes it practically impossible for any Sharecare employees to access a phone number in the call information.” She added that characterizing users’ voice “analysis in terms of ‘relationships’ helps contextualize the relevance of their stress and enables them to be more mindful day to day.”

    (Could not bring image over - see link.)

    Sharecare says its voice analysis feature does not record users’ phone calls, but it sends a notice after every call analyzing Sharecare users’ relationships — without informing people on the other end of the call that the app is doing so.

    Other researchers said such pervasive scanning could also have the opposite effect — increasing stress on otherwise healthy people.

    “It’s like we’re in school forever,” Professor Pasquale said, “and we’re being graded in all these ways forever by all the companies that have the most data about us.”
    There is a lot very wrong with these efforts. We sometimes hear the cliché: "If only one life is saved..." and this is an example of that. But 'saving one life' is not actually worth this type of surveillance even if you have the ability to 'opt-in' to it.

    We seem to be losing sight of the knowledge that human life is fraught with emotional ups-and-downs that are usually situational (although those situations can last months or years sometimes). What seems unbearable at 17 is intensely irritating at 27 and trivial at 37. It may not hit your radar after that.

    Distraught phone calls are a function of some female/female relationships and that can last for years. It doesn't mean the caller is going to kill herself - she's venting to someone who isn't going to hold it against her later. I'm the go-to recipient for a lot of calls like that because I'm agreeable and calm. I just listen and ask vague questions.

    Introverts (like me) probably show very high stress levels on phone calls from stupid or intrusive people. It doesn't mean we're going to cut ourselves or buy black tar heroin. It means we don't like to be interrupted.

    It's normal to be worried, sad, angry, anxious, or confused at various times. Being sad or bored is not life-threatening depression. Being angry is not a one-way ticket to interpersonal violence. Being 'nervous' in social situations is not the same thing as an 'anxiety disorder'. Worrying about actual events or likely probable future events is not a mental illness - it's correct or anticipation (also correct). It's how you solve problems that you can identify.

    I'm a fairly normal person despite having OCD but the reality is that my life sucks just the same way it sucks for anybody. People die, I get sad. People are stupid, I get irritated. Things happen, I worry. Sometimes I call my girlfriends and just vent. If I was on social media, maybe that would be data but it wouldn't tell you anything about my state of mind in a clinical sense.

    NYT
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."
  • scott
    Go-to Guru
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 15799

    #2
    Anyone who has gone through therapy knows that it usually works when it's needed and it creates the need for it when it's not needed. This is the same thing.
    "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
    -John Locke

    "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
    -Newman

    "Grievance groups are playing King of the Hill."
    -Newman

    Comment

    • Gingersnap
      Resident stylistic consultant
      • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
      • 24058

      #3
      Originally posted by scott View Post
      Anyone who has gone through therapy knows that it usually works when it's needed and it creates the need for it when it's not needed. This is the same thing.
      I have benefited greatly from very specific, very targeted therapeutic tools. They addressed my problem which is not a problem that really neat or really organized people have.

      All of that insight and practice doesn't mean that I don't get angry, sad, bored, or whatever. I do.

      The aim of mental health intervention shouldn't be to create people who never suffer in any way from the emotional blows of life. It should be to curb excessive reactions to normal emotional blows or stressors.

      You don't need to be 'perfect' - you just need to be marginally functional and stop scaring other people. You can still be cynical, bitchy, morose, boring, stupid, arrogant, shy, gossipy, temperamental, dramatic, or risky. Those things don't need to be 'fixed' professionally unless you want to stop being socially useless. You certainly don't need to be more charming.

      All of that is a far cry from having any mental illness that requires intervention.
      "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

      Comment

      • Lady Marva
        Senior Member
        • Wednesday, June 17, 2015
        • 13321

        #4
        Well, there is a simple way to prevent folks ,kike the Facebookers from analyzing your life..................... Don't own or use a cell phone.

        Comment

        • Celeste Chalfonte
          apostate
          • Saturday, October 5, 2013
          • 27897

          #5
          Originally posted by scott View Post
          Anyone who has gone through therapy knows that it usually works when it's needed and it creates the need for it when it's not needed. This is the same thing.
          This,

          “It’s this whole new potential for snake oil,” Dr. Steinhubl said.
          and this.

          AFAIC, therapy and its kin are like pain meds and anti-inflammatories: very effective and useful when needed after a trauma, damaging and/or addicting if continued when the need no longer exists. I can't even count the people I've encountered who did the same year of therapy over and over for 20 years or more.

          The focus on what we're feeling at every moment is an unhealthy reversion to a developmental stage that should have been completed in early adulthood at the latest. Yet another reason to stay off FB except to post your travelogue.
          "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

          Comment

          • Celeste Chalfonte
            apostate
            • Saturday, October 5, 2013
            • 27897

            #6
            Originally posted by Lady Marva View Post
            Well, there is a simple way to prevent folks ,kike the Facebookers from analyzing your life..................... Don't own or use a cell phone.
            And stay off all internet-connected computers, too. Definitely don't use public forums. Admin could be selling our data to mental health researchers! Expect the white-coat boys from Crownsville on your doorstep any day now.
            "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

            Comment

            • Gingersnap
              Resident stylistic consultant
              • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
              • 24058

              #7
              Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
              This,



              and this.

              AFAIC, therapy and its kin are like pain meds and anti-inflammatories: very effective and useful when needed after a trauma, damaging and/or addicting if continued when the need no longer exists. I can't even count the people I've encountered who did the same year of therapy over and over for 20 years or more.

              The focus on what we're feeling at every moment is an unhealthy reversion to a developmental stage that should have been completed in early adulthood at the latest. Yet another reason to stay off FB except to post your travelogue.
              I also know some of those people and it's tragic. Every problem or frustration is framed as crisis and every solution has to be "theraputic". Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.

              I think some of the latest research on fairly large groups has shown that immediate theraputic intervention after a trauma is actually counter-productive in the long-term. This is especially so when the trauma is second-hand (you didn't get shot - you knew somebody who got shot, etc.).

              Most people can recover from trauma on their own although they use different strategies. Some people need very limited, behavioral interventions and some people use trauma experiences as an emotional manipulation tool. A tiny percentage never recover under any circumstances.

              Reliving trauma and discussing it endlessly actually changes the way our brains organize memories. Not in a good way.
              "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

              Comment

              • Gramps
                Junior Member
                • Friday, October 4, 2013
                • 3850

                #8
                Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
                I also know some of those people and it's tragic. Every problem or frustration is framed as crisis and every solution has to be "theraputic". Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.

                I think some of the latest research on fairly large groups has shown that immediate theraputic intervention after a trauma is actually counter-productive in the long-term. This is especially so when the trauma is second-hand (you didn't get shot - you knew somebody who got shot, etc.).

                Most people can recover from trauma on their own although they use different strategies. Some people need very limited, behavioral interventions and some people use trauma experiences as an emotional manipulation tool. A tiny percentage never recover under any circumstances.

                Reliving trauma and discussing it endlessly actually changes the way our brains organize memories. Not in a good way.
                At the age of 17 we (mom and sister) were informed that my dad had been in an auto accident. We were taken to the emergency room where they were attempting to stabilize him. He had hooks in his chest with chains lifting his sternum and ribs off of his heart. We were allowed in because he wasn't expected to live. He lasted a month. At 18 I was awakened on a Sun morning by the highway patrol and taken to the emergency room. I watched my uncle die on the table and identified him. They took me to another room and lifted the sheets on 3 other bodies and I identified my aunt and 2 cousins. At 20 once again the highway patrol was at my door and informed me my sister (21 yrs old)was in an accident in Ok. They escorted me to the Will Rodgers turnpike where Oklahoma patrol cars escorted me into Tulsa. I was at my sisters bedside as she passed.

                I carry those images in my mind to this day, some 50 years later.
                They are vivid if I allow them to surface.

                I couldn't change any of it.
                That is my inner response when they surface.
                Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
                But the Republicans are racist.

                Comment

                • 80zephyr
                  Senior Member
                  • Saturday, January 3, 2015
                  • 19074

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Gramps View Post
                  At the age of 17 we (mom and sister) were informed that my dad had been in an auto accident. We were taken to the emergency room where they were attempting to stabilize him. He had hooks in his chest with chains lifting his sternum and ribs off of his heart. We were allowed in because he wasn't expected to live. He lasted a month. At 18 I was awakened on a Sun morning by the highway patrol and taken to the emergency room. I watched my uncle die on the table and identified him. They took me to another room and lifted the sheets on 3 other bodies and I identified my aunt and 2 cousins. At 20 once again the highway patrol was at my door and informed me my sister (21 yrs old)was in an accident in Ok. They escorted me to the Will Rodgers turnpike where Oklahoma patrol cars escorted me into Tulsa. I was at my sisters bedside as she passed.

                  I carry those images in my mind to this day, some 50 years later.
                  They are vivid if I allow them to surface.

                  I couldn't change any of it.
                  That is my inner response when they surface.
                  Wow. What a sad story. I hope that, while you can never heal from such an experience, that you have healed as much as humanly possible.

                  Mark
                  Race Card: A tool of the intellectually weak and lazy when they cannot counter a logical argument or factual data.

                  "Liberals have to stop insisting that the world is what they want it to be instead of the way it is." - Bill Maher

                  Political correctness is ideological fascism. It’s the antithesis of freedom. Dr. Piper

                  Gender is not a "Social Construct", it is an outgrowth of biological reality.

                  Comment

                  • Gramps
                    Junior Member
                    • Friday, October 4, 2013
                    • 3850

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 80zephyr View Post
                    Wow. What a sad story. I hope that, while you can never heal from such an experience, that you have healed as much as humanly possible.

                    Mark
                    The point is, there is no therapy involved.
                    I was raised in an era when shit happened, you couldn't change it so you accepted that fact knowing that bad things happen that you have zero control over.

                    Remember it, but get on with life.
                    Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
                    But the Republicans are racist.

                    Comment

                    • 80zephyr
                      Senior Member
                      • Saturday, January 3, 2015
                      • 19074

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Gramps View Post
                      The point is, there is no therapy involved.
                      I was raised in an era when shit happened, you couldn't change it so you accepted that fact knowing that bad things happen that you have zero control over.

                      Remember it, but get on with life.
                      Thats a good point. Its amazing that after WWII, so many men came back and lived fairly normal lives.

                      Mark
                      Race Card: A tool of the intellectually weak and lazy when they cannot counter a logical argument or factual data.

                      "Liberals have to stop insisting that the world is what they want it to be instead of the way it is." - Bill Maher

                      Political correctness is ideological fascism. It’s the antithesis of freedom. Dr. Piper

                      Gender is not a "Social Construct", it is an outgrowth of biological reality.

                      Comment

                      • Gramps
                        Junior Member
                        • Friday, October 4, 2013
                        • 3850

                        #12
                        Originally posted by 80zephyr View Post
                        Thats a good point. Its amazing that after WWII, so many men came back and lived fairly normal lives.

                        Mark
                        And Korea.

                        Between Korea and Viet Nam we changed.
                        Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
                        But the Republicans are racist.

                        Comment

                        • 80zephyr
                          Senior Member
                          • Saturday, January 3, 2015
                          • 19074

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Gramps View Post
                          And Korea.

                          Between Korea and Viet Nam we changed.
                          True. I wonder why?

                          Mark
                          Race Card: A tool of the intellectually weak and lazy when they cannot counter a logical argument or factual data.

                          "Liberals have to stop insisting that the world is what they want it to be instead of the way it is." - Bill Maher

                          Political correctness is ideological fascism. It’s the antithesis of freedom. Dr. Piper

                          Gender is not a "Social Construct", it is an outgrowth of biological reality.

                          Comment

                          • Gingersnap
                            Resident stylistic consultant
                            • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                            • 24058

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Gramps View Post
                            The point is, there is no therapy involved.
                            I was raised in an era when shit happened, you couldn't change it so you accepted that fact knowing that bad things happen that you have zero control over.

                            Remember it, but get on with life.
                            This is the real story.

                            Sigh.

                            You do it, you come to terms with it, and you come out the other side.

                            I would say "healing" happens whether you embrace it or not. It's like a physical injury - you may have scars or evidence seen on an x-ray but you don't stay in the moment forever. You may heal badly for various reasons but you do get healed. This doesn't mean nothing has changed but it doesn't have to mean that your life going forward is endlessly informed by the moment of trauma you have had.

                            I've had some bad turns myself that people would view as dangerously traumatic but it's just my life. I got over those things. I was able to put them in perspective (as I think Gramps was saying).

                            I think that's what a lot of people lack now. Your thing is bad. Really bad. It's not as bad as it could have been and as it is for unknown others. WWII vets knew this. Holocaust survivors knew it. People in the Depression knew it. Pioneers, all women prior to the 1930s, polio survivors, etc.

                            That doesn't diminish your experience but it does frame it better.

                            With so few real threats and utterly destructive events, we tend to magnify a lot of personal experiences too much. It's actually pretty easy to get over a near miss or something 'scary' but not injurious in a practical way or it is if you step back and don't listen to experts.
                            "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                            Comment

                            • Gramps
                              Junior Member
                              • Friday, October 4, 2013
                              • 3850

                              #15
                              Originally posted by 80zephyr View Post
                              True. I wonder why?

                              Mark
                              WWII and Korea were the last group of that generation.
                              They had grown up hard.
                              Expected no hand outs.
                              All they wanted was to make a living, no matter how hard.
                              They went through the great depression or were very, very close to it. My father and uncles who served in WWII and Korea had all seen great poverty and hardship.

                              My generation, the boomers, the Viet Nam era expected more.
                              Until the Nam draft, they never expected that they might have to serve.
                              That broke their comfort bubble.
                              I came from a very small town, very small school.
                              Every male in my graduating class served, except 3, of which 2 were disabled. I have no idea how the 3rd guy avoided it, I've spoken to him maybe 3 times since '65.
                              Not a one protested, marched or whatever.
                              We understood our duty.
                              Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy and lost
                              But the Republicans are racist.

                              Comment

                              Working...