Campuses Cautiously Train Freshmen Against Subtle Insults

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gingersnap
    Resident stylistic consultant
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 24058

    #1

    Campuses Cautiously Train Freshmen Against Subtle Insults

    Campuses Cautiously Train Freshmen Against Subtle Insults
    By STEPHANIE SAULSEPT. 6, 2016

    WORCESTER, Mass. — A freshman tentatively raises her hand and takes the microphone. “I’m really scared to ask this,” she begins. “When I, as a white female, listen to music that uses the N word, and I’m in the car, or, especially when I’m with all white friends, is it O.K. to sing along?”

    The answer, from Sheree Marlowe, the new chief diversity officer at Clark University, is an unequivocal “no.”

    The exchange was included in Ms. Marlowe’s presentation to recently arriving first-year students focusing on subtle “microaggressions,” part of a new campus vocabulary that also includes “safe spaces” and “trigger warnings.”

    Microaggressions, Ms. Marlowe said, are comments, snubs or insults that communicate derogatory or negative messages that might not be intended to cause harm but are targeted at people based on their membership in a marginalized group.

    Among her other tips: Don’t ask an Asian student you don’t know for help on your math homework or randomly ask a black student if he plays basketball. Both questions make assumptions based on stereotypes. And don’t say “you guys.” It could be interpreted as leaving out women, said Ms. Marlowe, who realized it was offensive only when someone confronted her for saying it during a presentation.

    Clark, a private liberal arts college that has long prided itself on diversity and inclusion, is far from the only university stepping up discussions of racism and diversity in orientation programs this year.

    Once devoted to ice cream socials, tutorials on campus technology systems and advice on choosing classes, orientation for new students is changing significantly, with the issue taking on renewed urgency this year as universities increasingly try to address recent racial and ethnic tensions on campuses as well as an onslaught of sexual assault complaints and investigations.

    In addition to diversity sessions, many campuses train students on exactly what constitutes sexual consent as well as how to intervene when they see fellow students drinking excessively or poised to engage in nonconsensual sexual behavior.

    A sampling of language and behaviors called “microagressions,” provided to Clark University students, that universities are urging students to avoid.

    A bystander intervention presentation for arriving freshmen at Wesleyan University last Thursday — “We Speak We Stand” — featured students acting out fictional episodes of campus sexual violence, harassment and problematic drinking, with examples of how to intervene. “Each of you has the power to bring to light sexual violence in our community,” one student told the group.

    Fresh on the minds of university officials are last year’s highly publicized episodes involving racist taunts at the University of Missouri in Columbia — which appear to have contributed to a precipitous decline in enrollment there this fall.

    “That closes your doors,” said Archie Ervin, the vice president for institute diversity at Georgia Institute of Technology and president of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education. “If you have sustained enrollment drops and disproportionately full-paying students such as out-of-state, the state legislature can’t make up the gap.”

    At the University of Wisconsin-Madison, officials have put together a diversity presentation as a pilot program this year for 1,000 freshmen — whom some colleges refer to with the gender-neutral term first-year students. That program, expected to cost $150,000 to $200,000, follows incidents on campus last year. In one, a racist note was slipped under a black student’s door, prompting Patrick Sims, the university’s vice provost for diversity and climate, to post an emotional video on YouTube titled “Enough is Enough.”

    Lori Berquam, the university’s dean of students, said in an interview that the sessions would try to address the fact that some students in Wisconsin, a predominantly white state, have little exposure to people of other races until they get to Madison. “It would not be unheard-of for a student to join us from the state of Wisconsin having had zero people of color in their high school,” Dr. Berquam said.

    In August, the University of Wisconsin system, which includes the Madison flagship and 25 other campuses, said it would ask the State Legislature for $6 million in funding to improve what it called the “university experience” for students. The request includes money for Fluent, a program described as a systemwide cultural training for faculty and staff members and students.

    But that budget request has provoked controversy. “If only the taxpayers and tuition-paying families had a safe space that might protect them from wasteful UW System spending on political correctness,” State Senator Stephen L. Nass, a Republican, said in a statement issued by his office, urging his fellow lawmakers to vote against the appropriation.

    Mr. Nass’s objection to spending money on diversity training reflects a rising resistance to what is considered campus political correctness. At some universities, alumni and students have objected to a variety of campus measures, including diversity training; “safe spaces,” places where students from marginalized groups can gather to discuss their experiences; and “trigger warnings,” disclaimers about possibly upsetting material in lesson plans.

    Some graduates have curtailed donations and students have suggested that diversity training smacks of some sort of communist re-education program.

    Sheree Marlowe, the chief diversity officer at Clark University. She works with students on how to avoid making assumptions based on stereotypes. Credit Kayana Szymczak for The New York Times
    The backlash was exemplified recently in a widely publicized letter sent to incoming freshmen at the University of Chicago by the dean of students, John Ellison.

    He warned that the university did not “support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial and we do not condone the creation of intellectual safe spaces where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

    Still, the push to respond to complaints about subtle cultural insensitivity, as well as more overt racist behavior, continues on campuses across the country. About 75 chief diversity officers have been hired by colleges and universities in the past 18 months, according to Dr. Ervin’s organization. The job frequently carries broad responsibilities that can include decision making on diversity in hiring and recruitment as well as sexual assault and misconduct.
    More. Read it all.

    Although the article appears to make the drop in enrollment about racism, that is not the reason for Mizzou's misery. The violent protests organized by those backing minority student issues are the actual cause. Parents took Mizzou off the table for a significant number of potential applicants. Donors (mostly white) took issue with the way the administration handled the problems. Allowing chaos and mob justice is not something that attracts a lot of normal people who write checks.

    The good news here is that we may see the end of rap and hip hop if enough white, middle class kids can be convinced that listening to it is 'cultural appropriation'. Absent the white, male teen/young adult buyers, there is probably not enough of an audience in today's fractured music scene to keep it going.

    So, not a total loss.

    NYT
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."
  • Lady Marva
    Senior Member
    • Wednesday, June 17, 2015
    • 13321

    #2
    Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
    The good news here is that we may see the end of rap and hip hop if enough white, middle class kids can be convinced that listening to it is 'cultural appropriation'. Absent the white, male teen/young adult buyers, there is probably not enough of an audience in today's fractured music scene to keep it going.

    So, not a total loss.
    Girl shoulda answered "If I'm in my own dang car with my own dang radio and my own dang friends, I'll sing what I want to sing. Cause guess what, MY car is MY safe space. I might even just sing the gospel music of the hard-right-wing evangelicals."
    So there.

    Comment

    • Celeste Chalfonte
      apostate
      • Saturday, October 5, 2013
      • 27897

      #3
      Well, my first thought (having just come from lunch in the plaza, where I was involuntarily "treated" to loud rap "music" using what sounded like nothing but cursewords and "n-----") was that the student's query would have been rendered moot by improving her taste in music. There is a fair amount of hip-hop music and even some rap that shows talent and is enjoyable to dance to. If I want to listen to someone shout obscenities at me, I can stand near one of the crazy people who inhabit the nearby bus stop. That's not music, it's noise.

      I'm no prude. The occasional off-color word or reference in music doesn't offend me, if it works in context. I like CeeLo Green's song "Fuck You." It totally conveys what one feels when encountering one's faithless, gold-digging ex cruising around town with her/his new sugar daddy/momma, and it's fun musically, although nothing unique. It actually works well as a lindy hop song, oddly enough. But the curseword makes sense in context and isn't the only audible word in the song, unlike the one I heard today, in which the only discernible word was "shit."

      That said, these are college students and they should grow the hell up and get the fuck over themselves. "Micro-aggressions," my ass. Teach the damned kids to stand up for themselves in the face of REAL aggression, like assault, battery and rape.

      When the Lion King had all the little kids on the playground roaring at each other, and HRH was intimidated, I didn't go around demanding the other parents make their kids stop roaring. I taught her to roar back. One day, we sat under the playground structure and roared at each other until we were hoarse. When she was 4, I let her take tae kwon do. When she was 6, a kid a head and a half taller than her tried to shove in line ahead of her. She held out her hand in a "stop" gesture and said, "I'm a martial artist. Don't make me shove back."
      "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

      Comment

      • Gingersnap
        Resident stylistic consultant
        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
        • 24058

        #4
        Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
        That said, these are college students and they should grow the hell up and get the fuck over themselves. "Micro-aggressions," my ass. Teach the damned kids to stand up for themselves in the face of REAL aggression, like assault, battery and rape.

        When the Lion King had all the little kids on the playground roaring at each other, and HRH was intimidated, I didn't go around demanding the other parents make their kids stop roaring. I taught her to roar back. One day, we sat under the playground structure and roared at each other until we were hoarse. When she was 4, I let her take tae kwon do. When she was 6, a kid a head and a half taller than her tried to shove in line ahead of her. She held out her hand in a "stop" gesture and said, "I'm a martial artist. Don't make me shove back."
        People have called me a prude. So what? If I don't want to be constantly confronted by sex and verbal violence, that's a valid choice.

        You have the right idea. Life is full of confrontational and uncomfortable situations. Teaching kids of any age to avoid that just makes them victims. Not just victims on the playground. It makes them victims politically, sexually, emotionally, intellectually, and victims economically.

        If you hide and avoid the hard questions, the hard answers will seek you out whether you like it or not. Better to face them head on and deal with it than to be blindsided by reality.
        "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

        Comment

        • phillygirl
          Not superior, just kind
          • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
          • 19840

          #5
          Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
          Well, my first thought (having just come from lunch in the plaza, where I was involuntarily "treated" to loud rap "music" using what sounded like nothing but cursewords and "n-----") was that the student's query would have been rendered moot by improving her taste in music. There is a fair amount of hip-hop music and even some rap that shows talent and is enjoyable to dance to. If I want to listen to someone shout obscenities at me, I can stand near one of the crazy people who inhabit the nearby bus stop. That's not music, it's noise.

          I'm no prude. The occasional off-color word or reference in music doesn't offend me, if it works in context. I like CeeLo Green's song "Fuck You." It totally conveys what one feels when encountering one's faithless, gold-digging ex cruising around town with her/his new sugar daddy/momma, and it's fun musically, although nothing unique. It actually works well as a lindy hop song, oddly enough. But the curseword makes sense in context and isn't the only audible word in the song, unlike the one I heard today, in which the only discernible word was "shit."

          That said, these are college students and they should grow the hell up and get the fuck over themselves. "Micro-aggressions," my ass. Teach the damned kids to stand up for themselves in the face of REAL aggression, like assault, battery and rape.

          When the Lion King had all the little kids on the playground roaring at each other, and HRH was intimidated, I didn't go around demanding the other parents make their kids stop roaring. I taught her to roar back. One day, we sat under the playground structure and roared at each other until we were hoarse. When she was 4, I let her take tae kwon do. When she was 6, a kid a head and a half taller than her tried to shove in line ahead of her. She held out her hand in a "stop" gesture and said, "I'm a martial artist. Don't make me shove back."
          My mother parented like you…only not quite as nuanced. My sister was a bit shy and introverted and easily had her feelings hurt as a kid. She had a friend in the neighborhood who would be her friend, then suddenly become "violent" and hit her…resulting in my sister coming home in tears that Sally had hit her. There was always a rule in our house that we were never to hit first. My mother was tired of dealing with my sister's tears and had told her that she was not to ever come home crying again. If Sally hit her, she was to hit her back, right in the nose. Sure enough, my sister came home crying again and my mother asked if she had hit back. The answer was no and my mother forced her out, telling her not to come back until she had hit her back. My sister rang the girl's doorbell. Sally answered. My sister balled up her tiny fist (she was about 6), punched her square in the nose and ran all the way back home. Sally never hit her again!

          I was a much quicker study. My mother saw "Big Stacey" (as opposed to my friend "Little Stacey" leave our yard crying one day. She asked me why Stacey was crying and my response, with a shrug, was "She hitted me first". "Well, why was Stacey crying?" "Because I hitted her second".
          Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
          Robert Southwell, S.J.

          Comment

          • Novaheart
            Guardian of civilization
            • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
            • 6070

            #6
            "And don’t say “you guys.”"

            Fuck her
            The year's at the spring
            And day's at the morn;
            Morning's at seven;
            The hill-side's dew-pearled;
            The lark's on the wing;
            The snail's on the thorn:
            God's in his heaven—
            All's right with the world!

            Comment

            • Novaheart
              Guardian of civilization
              • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
              • 6070

              #7
              "Fresh on the minds of university officials are last year’s highly publicized episodes involving racist taunts at the University of Missouri in Columbia — which appear to have contributed to a precipitous decline in enrollment there this fall."

              Are we tired of this shit yet? Good old liberal press telling lies- and the fuckwads at the Univ. of Missouri who buckled under to football players on a free ride. The incident in question happened off campus and out of reach of the authority of the Dean.
              The year's at the spring
              And day's at the morn;
              Morning's at seven;
              The hill-side's dew-pearled;
              The lark's on the wing;
              The snail's on the thorn:
              God's in his heaven—
              All's right with the world!

              Comment

              • Novaheart
                Guardian of civilization
                • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                • 6070

                #8
                "“It would not be unheard-of for a student to join us from the state of Wisconsin having had zero people of color in their high school,” Dr. Berquam said."

                And not a soul fact checked her.
                The year's at the spring
                And day's at the morn;
                Morning's at seven;
                The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                The lark's on the wing;
                The snail's on the thorn:
                God's in his heaven—
                All's right with the world!

                Comment

                • phillygirl
                  Not superior, just kind
                  • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                  • 19840

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
                  "And don’t say “you guys.”"

                  Fuck her
                  I still remember shortly after moving to PA and 3 of us girls were sitting on a fence. Neighborhood boys begins to talk to us and opens with "hey you guys". I kept looking around to see where the boys were he was talking to. Strange how that figure of speech just didn't happen in Cincinnati.
                  Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                  Robert Southwell, S.J.

                  Comment

                  • Novaheart
                    Guardian of civilization
                    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                    • 6070

                    #10
                    Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
                    I still remember shortly after moving to PA and 3 of us girls were sitting on a fence. Neighborhood boys begins to talk to us and opens with "hey you guys". I kept looking around to see where the boys were he was talking to. Strange how that figure of speech just didn't happen in Cincinnati.
                    It wasn't "yinz"?

                    I hear males and females calling female friends "dude". It's stupid but apparently gender neutral at this point. Waiters routinely refer to mixed sex parties as "you guys" . "You guys need anything?"
                    The year's at the spring
                    And day's at the morn;
                    Morning's at seven;
                    The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                    The lark's on the wing;
                    The snail's on the thorn:
                    God's in his heaven—
                    All's right with the world!

                    Comment

                    • phillygirl
                      Not superior, just kind
                      • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                      • 19840

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
                      It wasn't "yinz"?

                      I hear males and females calling female friends "dude". It's stupid but apparently gender neutral at this point. Waiters routinely refer to mixed sex parties as "you guys" . "You guys need anything?"
                      Definitely not "yinz". I even use you guys now.
                      Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                      Robert Southwell, S.J.

                      Comment

                      • Gingersnap
                        Resident stylistic consultant
                        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                        • 24058

                        #12
                        Both 'you guys' and 'dude' are now common for both sexes. It's stupid but prevalent. Far from excluding girls, it's a common reference when the user is too lazy or ignorant to use a better term. It's very common among poor through lower middle class kids of either sex.

                        That college people would champion a return to better references in the name of "sexism" is hilarious.
                        "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                        Comment

                        • Michele
                          Senior Member
                          • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                          • 13964

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
                          Both 'you guys' and 'dude' are now common for both sexes. It's stupid but prevalent. Far from excluding girls, it's a common reference when the user is too lazy or ignorant to use a better term. It's very common among poor through lower middle class kids of either sex.

                          That college people would champion a return to better references in the name of "sexism" is hilarious.
                          You hear the phrase "you guys" everywhere and have for a long time. How is it stupid, lazy, ignorant or common for poor and lower middle class kids when it's so widely used by so many different people?

                          "Dude" I can probably agree with you on.
                          May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
                          Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
                          And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
                          may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

                          Comment

                          • gary m
                            Reprobate
                            • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                            • 8016

                            #14
                            You all (or its contraction y'all) sounds trashy and "you guys and gals" is probably sexist in some way.

                            There probably is some word or words that is not considered a micro-aggressive, dog whistling, sexist, politically incorrect, safe space inducing trigger warning, but damned if I know what it is.
                            We are so fucked.

                            Comment

                            • Celeste Chalfonte
                              apostate
                              • Saturday, October 5, 2013
                              • 27897

                              #15
                              Originally posted by gary m View Post
                              You all (or its contraction y'all) sounds trashy and "you guys and gals" is probably sexist in some way.

                              There probably is some word or words that is not considered a micro-aggressive, dog whistling, sexist, politically incorrect, safe space inducing trigger warning, but damned if I know what it is.
                              Only to ignorant Yankees and foreigners.
                              "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

                              Comment

                              Working...