Redskins trademarks canceled by U.S. Patent Office

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Adam
    The way to a woman's heart is through her taste buds.
    • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    • 16885

    #1

    Redskins trademarks canceled by U.S. Patent Office




    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board canceled six federal trademark registrations owned by the Washington NFL club today, ruling that the term "Redskins" was disparaging to "a substantial composite" of American Indians when the marks were granted between 1967 and 1990. The decision does not mean the Washington team must stop using the name.

    The team's attorneys said the team will appeal. The team prevailed on appeal in an earlier iteration of the case.

    "We are confident we will prevail once again, and that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's divided ruling will be overturned on appeal," said team attorney Robert Raskopf in a statement. "This case is no different than an earlier case, where the Board cancelled the Redskins' trademark registrations, and where a federal district court disagreed and reversed the Board."

    The Washington NFL club retains its federal trademark rights pending appeal. And even if the club loses on appeal, it can continue to use the name, as it has for more than 80 years. But without federal trademark protection, others could potentially use the team's name and logos to sell merchandise with impunity, although owners of unregistered marks can still try to protect them through state statutes or common law. The team has two months to file the appeal.
    Unfuckingbelievable! And actual Indians don't mind the name at all. This has been proven over and over and over again.

    Good grief.
    It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
    In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
    Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
    Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now
  • Norm dePlume
    Err foil
    • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    • 14904

    #2
    Originally posted by Adam View Post
    Unfuckingbelievable! And actual Indians don't mind the name at all. This has been proven over and over and over again.

    Good grief.
    Is Suzan Shown Harjo an actual Indian? I mean, I know she's not from India. But, you know, American Indian.
    Enjoy.

    Comment

    • Hondo
      Memento Homo
      • Sunday, October 6, 2013
      • 2473

      #3
      I think I'm okay with this.

      Comment

      • Adam
        The way to a woman's heart is through her taste buds.
        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
        • 16885

        #4
        LOL!

        It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
        In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
        Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
        Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

        Comment

        • Celeste Chalfonte
          apostate
          • Saturday, October 5, 2013
          • 27897

          #5
          Originally posted by Adam View Post
          I think Orangemen would only be offensive to the Fighting Irish (and probably then only if they could actually BEAT the Irish). <snerk>
          "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

          Comment

          • JB
            Don't believe the hype
            • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
            • 4408

            #6
            Originally posted by Adam View Post
            Unfuckingbelievable! And actual Indians don't mind the name at all. This has been proven over and over and over again.
            "one of the earliest known citations of its use is by a Native American called Chief Black Thunder".

            "in 2004, a poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania...concluded that 91% of the American Indians surveyed in the 48 states on the mainland USA found the name acceptable". ~ both via wiki

            Someone needs to unbunch her panties.
            Once you vote yourselves into Communism, you must shoot your way out.

            Science that cannot be questioned is propaganda.

            Comment

            • Norm dePlume
              Err foil
              • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
              • 14904

              #7
              So the other 9% can go screw themselves?
              Enjoy.

              Comment

              • gary m
                Reprobate
                • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                • 8016

                #8
                Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                So the other 9% can go screw themselves?
                Or they could consolidate some of their casino cash, buy a sports franchise and name it the Yellowhairs.
                Their mascot could ride on a horse and pretend to scalp white people.

                I'd call it even.
                We are so fucked.

                Comment

                • Frostbit
                  But only once
                  • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                  • 22330

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                  So the other 9% can go screw themselves?
                  Norm, are you serious or just trolling? Do you sincerely envision a society where no one is ever offended? Please tell me where that is.
                  If it pays, it stays

                  Comment

                  • gary m
                    Reprobate
                    • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                    • 8016

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Frostbit View Post
                    Norm, are you serious or just trolling? Do you sincerely envision a society where no one is ever offended? Please tell me where that is.
                    Is this a poll and do we all get to vote?
                    We are so fucked.

                    Comment

                    • Norm dePlume
                      Err foil
                      • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
                      • 14904

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Frostbit View Post
                      Norm, are you serious or just trolling? Do you sincerely envision a society where no one is ever offended? Please tell me where that is.
                      No, I envision a society in which those who are offended by a trademark can petition to have that trademark rescinded and if their case is found to be valid the trademark is rescinded regardless of how many other people you can find who don't care one way or the other.
                      Enjoy.

                      Comment

                      • Novaheart
                        Guardian of civilization
                        • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                        • 6070

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                        So the other 9% can go screw themselves?
                        Yep, especially since most of them are of the notorious Blonde Indian tribe with names like Sean "Thunderbird" O'Hanlon. The US is littered with the great grandchildren of "Cherokee Princesses" and black people with black feet.

                        Tell me that these "Native Americans" don't need to be DNA tested.

                        The year's at the spring
                        And day's at the morn;
                        Morning's at seven;
                        The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                        The lark's on the wing;
                        The snail's on the thorn:
                        God's in his heaven—
                        All's right with the world!

                        Comment

                        • Frostbit
                          But only once
                          • Wednesday, October 2, 2013
                          • 22330

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                          No, I envision a society in which those who are offended by a trademark can petition to have that trademark rescinded and if their case is found to be valid the trademark is rescinded regardless of how many other people you can find who don't care one way or the other.
                          Do you really think this "offended by "Redskins"" movement came from Native Americans? Seriously? I do not mean those that are now used as a spokesperson.

                          I suppose soon the word FAT will be banned from use in public because it offends some morbidly obese people.

                          I suppose soon the word short will be banned because some vertically challenged want it so.

                          What if the 91% of Redskins that are not offended by the name become offended because the 9% are offended shouldn't we reinstitute the patent so as not to offend the 91%?

                          You have got to be fucking kidding me.
                          If it pays, it stays

                          Comment

                          • Norm dePlume
                            Err foil
                            • Tuesday, October 22, 2013
                            • 14904

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Frostbit View Post
                            Do you really think this "offended by "Redskins"" movement came from Native Americans? Seriously? I do not mean those that are now used as a spokesperson.

                            I suppose soon the word FAT will be banned from use in public because it offends some morbidly obese people.

                            I suppose soon the word short will be banned because some vertically challenged want it so.

                            What if the 91% of Redskins that are not offended by the name become offended because the 9% are offended shouldn't we reinstitute the patent so as not to offend the 91%?

                            You have got to be fucking kidding me.
                            Suzan Shown Harjo filed a case in 1992. I asked earlier if she were an actual Indian. Nobody answered my question.

                            None of your suppositions follow from the facts of this case, so non fucking sequitur.
                            Enjoy.

                            Comment

                            • Novaheart
                              Guardian of civilization
                              • Tuesday, October 1, 2013
                              • 6070

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                              Suzan Shown Harjo filed a case in 1992. I asked earlier if she were an actual Indian. Nobody answered my question.

                              None of your suppositions follow from the facts of this case, so non fucking sequitur.
                              She appears to not only be a real Indian, but to have made a lucrative career out of it.
                              The year's at the spring
                              And day's at the morn;
                              Morning's at seven;
                              The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                              The lark's on the wing;
                              The snail's on the thorn:
                              God's in his heaven—
                              All's right with the world!

                              Comment

                              Working...