Does Russia, via Putin, have a right to worry about NATO in his side yard?
Russia and Ukraine
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Since neither NATO nor Ukraine, to the best of my knowledge, has ay history of invading sovereign countries, I'd say no. The only reason to be concerned that your neighbor is joining a mutual defense organization is if you're planning to invade them, which is not, in my mind, a legitimate concern.Originally posted by phillygirl View PostDoes Russia, via Putin, have a right to worry about NATO in his side yard?"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
-
Not really. NATO has been on Russia’s border since 1949.
Putin’s concern, not to be confused with Russia’s concern, is the prosperity of the West getting closer.
It is not a fear of military invasion. It is a fear of envy.Last edited by Billy Jingo; Monday, February 28, 2022, 9:36 PM.“One day, when it's safe, when there's no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it's too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this.”
~ Omar El Akkad
Comment
-
Does Russia have the right to support ethnic Russians in Ukraine that wish to separate from the Ukraine?Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
Robert Southwell, S.J.
Comment
-
I'm an ethnic Scot. If all the ethnic Scots on the ESM decided they wanted to separate from the US, would it be OK for the UK to send troops into the US to facilitate that?Originally posted by phillygirl View PostDoes Russia have the right to support ethnic Russians in Ukraine that wish to separate from the Ukraine?"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
👍 1Comment
-
“Right” is a meaningless term in this context. Are you asking if Russia’s cause is just?Originally posted by phillygirl View PostDoes Russia have the right to support ethnic Russians in Ukraine that wish to separate from the Ukraine?“One day, when it's safe, when there's no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it's too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this.”
~ Omar El Akkad
Comment
-
What if two border counties in Arizona, most of whom were Mexican by ethnicity, speak Spanish, and closely identify with Mexico, want to be part of Mexico (again)? And to boot, Mexicos capital was contained in one of those two counties before the U.s. annexed them. Would Mexico be wrong in supporting those counties who want to come back to the Motherland?Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
I'm an ethnic Scot. If all the ethnic Scots on the ESM decided they wanted to separate from the US, would it be OK for the UK to send troops into the US to facilitate that?
Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
Robert Southwell, S.J.
Comment
-
-
Supporting them how? Militarily? Yes, Mexico would be wrong to invade a US state.Originally posted by phillygirl View PostWhat if two border counties in Arizona, most of whom were Mexican by ethnicity, speak Spanish, and closely identify with Mexico, want to be part of Mexico (again)? And to boot, Mexicos capital was contained in one of those two counties before the U.s. annexed them. Would Mexico be wrong in supporting those counties who want to come back to the Motherland?"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
Comment
-
^^^ What she said.Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
Since neither NATO nor Ukraine, to the best of my knowledge, has ay history of invading sovereign countries, I'd say no. The only reason to be concerned that your neighbor is joining a mutual defense organization is if you're planning to invade them, which is not, in my mind, a legitimate concern.It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now
Comment
-
"Support" by conquering land? No. If there were some manner of ethnic cleansing or something, that might be a different story, but that's not been happening in Ukraine. They're not perfect: the government there is a mess by any Western standard, relations aren't ideal in a lot of circumstances, but the place has been generally peaceful among themselves for thirty-odd years.Originally posted by phillygirl View PostDoes Russia have the right to support ethnic Russians in Ukraine that wish to separate from the Ukraine?
There's tons of room in Russia. If you're in Ukraine and feel that you're an ethnic Russian, then pack your shit and go north. No one is stopping you.It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now
👍 1Comment
-
We are romanticizing Ukraine right now, turning Ukrainians into something akin to perfect Noble Savages. And likewise we are simplifying the rot of this conflicts, boiling it down to Putin Bad, shades of the crap Trump endured (and still does). We are swimming in propaganda, probably from all corners.Originally posted by Adam View Post
"Support" by conquering land? No. If there were some manner of ethnic cleansing or something, that might be a different story, but that's not been happening in Ukraine. They're not perfect: the government there is a mess by any Western standard, relations aren't ideal in a lot of circumstances, but the place has been generally peaceful among themselves for thirty-odd years.
There's tons of room in Russia. If you're in Ukraine and feel that you're an ethnic Russian, then pack your shit and go north. No one is stopping you.
Amidst the complications we are skimming over are the demography of Russia, and the strategic importance of ground access to ports.
It seems clear to me, at least, that Putin is capitalizing on Biden's frailty, and that he's caught by surprise at the backlash. I think Biden baited Putin into attacking, but I'm not sure it was deliberate, or stupid.
I think we are getting a good view of the world without a competently led U.S. superpower in the driver's seat. At least at this moment in human history.
- "I'm a hell of a lot smarter than most of you guys." — Joe Biden, at Jesse Jackson's funeral, March 2026.
- "That's all I do in my life. I make deals. I'm really good at it." — President Donald Trump, Oct. 13, 2025.
- “Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out,” — David Horowitz.
- "We [Democrats] are all willing to work with anyone who is serious about doing the work of censoring the American people, and advancing progress." — Ayanna Pressley, explaining progressives.
- "Florida is where Woke goes to die." — Ron DeSantis.
- "No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." — Nancy Pelosi, explaining Lawfare.
- “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”— Ben Franklin, who got it right.
- "The way I see it, there's always, c'mon, there's always money. It's there." — Elizabeth Warren, explaining socialism.
- "The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a climate thing at all.... We really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing." — Saikat Chakrabarti, then AOC's Chief of Staff.
👍 1Comment
-
So let's say Mexico doesn't invade, but instead simply says to those in Arizona..."we're here if you need us, and just in case the U.S. starts cracking down on you, we're going to get Canada and England to show you some support as well. We're not invading at all, nope, not doing that, but we have a lot of stuff over here, just in case, and we're going to move that stuff, just a few airplanes and missiles and what not, a little closer to the border. Good luck with your attempts at freedom. Again, we're just here if you need us, nothing for the U.S. to worry about, at all, just a little support for our friends."Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
Supporting them how? Militarily? Yes, Mexico would be wrong to invade a US state.Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
Robert Southwell, S.J.
Comment
-
Come on people.Putin believes that Russia still has influence in the world. And with every new NATO country, Russia loses some "power". I have already posted an article explaining why Putin is doing what he is doing.
MarkRace Card: A tool of the intellectually weak and lazy when they cannot counter a logical argument or factual data.
"Liberals have to stop insisting that the world is what they want it to be instead of the way it is." - Bill Maher
Political correctness is ideological fascism. It’s the antithesis of freedom. Dr. Piper
Gender is not a "Social Construct", it is an outgrowth of biological reality.
Comment
-
If Mexico and Canada have never in modern history invaded another country, and aren't sending bombers across the border, we would be within reason to object to those actions, but not to strike out pre-emptively.Originally posted by phillygirl View PostSo let's say Mexico doesn't invade, but instead simply says to those in Arizona..."we're here if you need us, and just in case the U.S. starts cracking down on you, we're going to get Canada and England to show you some support as well. We're not invading at all, nope, not doing that, but we have a lot of stuff over here, just in case, and we're going to move that stuff, just a few airplanes and missiles and what not, a little closer to the border. Good luck with your attempts at freedom. Again, we're just here if you need us, nothing for the U.S. to worry about, at all, just a little support for our friends."
But now you're making up fairy tales, because that's not what happened."Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
Comment
Comment